The fight is not over whether Mike Lindell asked for a recount, but what ballots Minnesota election officials would recount if he pays. The dispute puts a costly, statewide review request on hold as the general-election campaign approaches.
Mike Lindell is withholding payment for a recount request in Minnesota’s Republican primary for governor, saying the state’s proposed recount would be too narrow. His campaign says it has $825,000 ready for the process but will not submit the money unless officials agree to recount all votes cast in the GOP gubernatorial primary, not just votes for Lindell and Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth.
The dispute matters because payment is required to trigger a discretionary statewide recount. Minnesota election officials say their plan follows state law, administrative rules and procedures used for comparable recounts over the past two decades.
A recount request stalled over scope
Lindell, the MyPillow founder, finished second to Demuth in the Republican primary, according to current results cited by CBS Minnesota. State election figures show Demuth received 179,683 votes and Lindell received 134,282.
Lindell had said he would personally pay for a recount. But his campaign later said it was holding the required payment because it objects to the proposed parameters of the review.
The central disagreement is straightforward but consequential: Lindell’s team says a recount should determine the total number of valid votes cast for the governor’s race. The Secretary of State’s office planned a recount centered on the votes cast for the apparent winner and the candidate seeking the recount.
That difference affects what would be examined, how the results would be reported and what the unusually large payment would fund.
Lindell wants every primary vote reviewed
According to his campaign, the state’s contingent recount plan would recount votes for Lindell and Demuth while excluding votes cast for other Republican candidates in the primary. The campaign argues that approach does not meet Minnesota’s statutory definition of a recount.
It cited language in state law defining a recount as determining the number of votes validly cast for the office or question being recounted. Lindell’s position is that the office in question is governor, meaning the review should not be limited to the top two candidates.
His campaign has called on the state to waive the payment deadline while a court decides whether election officials’ proposed recount structure is lawful. That request turns what might otherwise be an administrative election procedure into a potential legal dispute over how Minnesota’s recount law should be interpreted.
Lindell’s campaign also said the money was “primed and ready” to cover the cost. Still, having funds available is not the same as filing the payment and formal request required to begin the process.
State officials defend their plan
Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon’s office rejects the claim that its approach is unlawful. Cassondra Knudson, a spokesperson for the office, said the contingent recount plan was approved by the State Canvassing Board on Aug. 18.
Knudson said the plan follows state law and administrative rules and is consistent with recount plans used for similar circumstances over the past 20 years. That response frames the disagreement as one over Lindell’s reading of the rules, not a departure by the state from established practice.
The state had already released documents outlining how a statewide hand recount would work if one were requested. Under that plan, the director of elections would serve as the state recount official and could appoint deputies and assistants to oversee counting locations around Minnesota.
The documents also say the recount would be open to the public and media. Public access can make the mechanics of a recount more visible, but it does not settle the legal question of which ballots or candidate totals should be included in the review.
Why the payment deadline matters
Minnesota law requires an apparent losing candidate seeking a discretionary recount to submit the request and the funds needed to cover it within five days of the primary canvass. The rule is designed to prevent an open-ended recount process and to ensure counties and the state are not left covering the expense of a candidate-requested review.
For Lindell, the deadline creates pressure. Paying under the current terms could mean proceeding with a recount he says is improperly limited. Refusing to pay could leave him without the requested statewide recount unless the state grants relief or a court intervenes.
For election administrators, the timing requirement is part of keeping the election calendar moving. A recount is labor-intensive, particularly when it spans an entire state, and it must fit within certification and general-election deadlines.
The $825,000 figure also illustrates the scale of the request. A statewide hand recount requires workers, facilities, oversight and coordination across multiple jurisdictions, even before accounting for the legal and logistical disputes surrounding it.
No official fraud finding supports claim
Lindell said on primary night, Aug. 11, that he would not concede until every vote was counted. He said his team had noticed “anomalies” it wanted time to review, but CBS Minnesota reported that he did not provide evidence at that time.
There have been no official findings of fraud or irregularities in the Minnesota primary results. That distinction is important: a candidate may request a recount under state procedures without election authorities having found evidence that the initial count was compromised.
Recounts can confirm an initial outcome, change small vote totals or, less commonly, alter a winner in an exceptionally close contest. They are not, by themselves, proof of misconduct. In this case, the current reported margin between Demuth and Lindell is more than 45,000 votes.
Lindell’s campaign is making a procedural argument about the breadth of the count, while state officials are defending the validity of the process they approved. Those are separate questions from whether there is verified evidence of voting problems.
The governor race moves forward
Demuth is the Republican nominee and is set to face Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar in the Nov. 3 general election to succeed retiring Gov. Tim Walz, according to CBS Minnesota. The recount dispute therefore unfolds alongside the transition from an intraparty contest to the broader statewide campaign.
What happens next depends on whether Lindell submits the payment, whether the state changes or waives its deadline, and whether he asks a court to rule on the recount’s scope. The source material does not establish that a court challenge has been filed.
The immediate takeaway is that Lindell has not abandoned his call for a recount; he is withholding payment over the terms under which it would occur. Minnesota’s election office, meanwhile, maintains that its existing plan is lawful, approved and consistent with past practice.
Leave a Reply